Comments on: Observational Learning 002 http://www.coachjayjohnson.com/2009/02/observational-learning-002-2/ A running resouce for coaches and athletes Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:28:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: billzeebub http://www.coachjayjohnson.com/2009/02/observational-learning-002-2/#comment-291 billzeebub Tue, 08 Sep 2009 03:52:35 +0000 http://www.coachjayjohnson.com/?p=270#comment-291 You should link this page to your "why so negative" piece on the coaching site.<br><br>Kelly Holmes Olympic double was another fine example of negative splits being brought into play effectively against athletes of equal ability. <br><br>There's a fine line between saving yourself for the 2nd half of your race and saving it all up for the final 200m, but only one of these will produce performances which match your potential and it's never going to be the latter. Whilst banging off at the front can be fun for up to 3/4 distance, it's likely to get messy over the final 1/4 distance as you work your way back through the field, whilst trying to cling to those who've just used the target you painted on your back when the gun went.<br><br>It's all about racing smart. If YOU race smart in an evenly matched field, then the odds are that you've already got half your opposition beat and that's a huge load off your mind going into competition. You should link this page to your “why so negative” piece on the coaching site.

Kelly Holmes Olympic double was another fine example of negative splits being brought into play effectively against athletes of equal ability.

There's a fine line between saving yourself for the 2nd half of your race and saving it all up for the final 200m, but only one of these will produce performances which match your potential and it's never going to be the latter. Whilst banging off at the front can be fun for up to 3/4 distance, it's likely to get messy over the final 1/4 distance as you work your way back through the field, whilst trying to cling to those who've just used the target you painted on your back when the gun went.

It's all about racing smart. If YOU race smart in an evenly matched field, then the odds are that you've already got half your opposition beat and that's a huge load off your mind going into competition.

]]> By: T Floeck http://www.coachjayjohnson.com/2009/02/observational-learning-002-2/#comment-292 T Floeck Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:20:22 +0000 http://www.coachjayjohnson.com/?p=270#comment-292 Jay....don't tell anyone, haha. No seriously I have friends who coach who would be upset with this observational learning. They think it is a big secret, pace that is. <br><br>I love the arguments about pace, because I love it that most people feel the need to "get out hard." I also love that most people are absolutely set in this mind frame, because I will continue to try to capitalize on the mistakes of others as a coach.<br><br>About this video specifically, it is hard to get splits, but from what I can tell there are about seven women at least who ran a faster last 800 or 808 meters than the previous 800 meters. I think they were around 2:20 at 800 meters. I also noticed the women who seem to chill in the back and waited the longest to strike (Lauren Centrowitz the winner) seemed to run the strongest races, although Amy Yoder-Begley pushing the pace like that may have helped the overall time. Sara was impressive and it takes confidence to relax in the back and then go to work at the end, typically that confidence comes from experience in being able to execute this type of race in the past. <br><br>I don't know how many times I've heard. "I went out conservatively in this race..." and found out the person ran a PB. I know I've heard that often. Despite this I know there are a lot of people who will disagree with this philosophy on racing....and I LOVE IT! <br><br>"The idea that you can't lose contact with the leaders has cut more throats than it has saved." - Arthur Lydiard<br><br>But really....you need to get out HARD. Establish position, always! Jay….don't tell anyone, haha. No seriously I have friends who coach who would be upset with this observational learning. They think it is a big secret, pace that is.

I love the arguments about pace, because I love it that most people feel the need to “get out hard.” I also love that most people are absolutely set in this mind frame, because I will continue to try to capitalize on the mistakes of others as a coach.

About this video specifically, it is hard to get splits, but from what I can tell there are about seven women at least who ran a faster last 800 or 808 meters than the previous 800 meters. I think they were around 2:20 at 800 meters. I also noticed the women who seem to chill in the back and waited the longest to strike (Lauren Centrowitz the winner) seemed to run the strongest races, although Amy Yoder-Begley pushing the pace like that may have helped the overall time. Sara was impressive and it takes confidence to relax in the back and then go to work at the end, typically that confidence comes from experience in being able to execute this type of race in the past.

I don't know how many times I've heard. “I went out conservatively in this race…” and found out the person ran a PB. I know I've heard that often. Despite this I know there are a lot of people who will disagree with this philosophy on racing….and I LOVE IT!

“The idea that you can't lose contact with the leaders has cut more throats than it has saved.” – Arthur Lydiard

But really….you need to get out HARD. Establish position, always!

]]> By: CoachJay http://www.coachjayjohnson.com/2009/02/observational-learning-002-2/#comment-293 CoachJay Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:29:17 +0000 http://www.coachjayjohnson.com/?p=270#comment-293 Who ran a negative split race? Who ran a negative split race?

]]>